By Manfred Krifka, Austinlsaarbriicken
Read Online or Download A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus PDF
Similar semantics books
This research presents a constant description and clarification of the syntax, the semantics and the pragmatics of Spanish temper. an important concentration of realization is the important position of the truthfunctional different types of realis, potentialis and irrealis as parameters proper to temper choice in either subordinate and non-subordinate clauses.
This paintings represents the 1st built-in account of the way deixis operates to facilitate issues of view, offering the uncooked fabric for reconciling index and item. The e-book deals a clean, utilized philosophical method utilizing unique empirical facts to teach that deictic demonstratives hasten the popularity of middle representational constructs.
Metasemantics contains new paintings at the philosophical foundations of linguistic semantics, by way of a various crew of confirmed and rising specialists within the philosophy of language, metaphysics, and the idea of content material. The technological know-how of semantics aspires to systematically specify the meanings of linguistic expressions in context.
This quantity is a part of the sequence ‘Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology’, edited for Springer by way of Alessandro Capone. it's meant for an viewers of undergraduate and graduate scholars, in addition to postgraduate and complicated researchers. This quantity specializes in societal pragmatics. one of many major issues of societal pragmatics is the area of language clients.
- A Theory of Conventional Implicature & Pragmatic Markers in Chinese
- Metaphor: Implications and Applications
- Language Myths, Mysteries and Magic
- Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity
- Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings (Linguistics: The Essential Readings)
Extra resources for A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus
3 Methodology Research on domain-categorization – as lexical typology in general – has on the whole made relatively little use of secondary sources, but often relies on primary data. , Nerlove & Romney’s 1967; or Greenberg 1980) largely utilize the available earlier descriptions of particular languages, but this, in turn, depends on the long descriptive tradition of the domain starting with Morgan’s (1870) early typology of kinship systems. Viberg’s study (1984, 2001) of perception verbs involves a combination of secondary data sources (dictionaries, word lists and more detailed descriptions) and systematic translation of sentences in a questionnaire; Ricca’s (1993) study of deictic verbs is mainly based on a questionnaire.
Male relative of one’s patriline’ for ‘father’ and ‘father’s brother’). , the sibling terminology (where the generalizations can be formulated as lexicalization implications); this, in turn, can be explained by the role of the corresponding relations in regulating marriage possibilities (for details cf. Evans 2001). Most lexicalization generalizations build on the unequal status of different words and other lexicalized expressions – either for encoding a particular conceptual domain, or in general.
A few of the other surprises include the non-universal status of “water” and “sun” based on the fact that languages can have more than one word for each of those (cf. “hot water” vs. “non-hot water in Japanese, “sun low in the sky” vs. “hot sun overhead” in Nyawaygi, Australia). Emotions, contrary to many common assumptions, turn out to be highly culture- and language-specific. “Mother”, in its biological sense, has reasonable chances to survive as a lexical universal too, whereas “father’s” chances are considerably lower (since his role is much more subject to social factors).
A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus by Manfred Krifka, Austinlsaarbriicken